8/ MANAGEMENT (IN) SOCIETY
In this article I will try to clarify the forms of management of our society. Again I will write a little in a sci-fi spirit so that it is possible to see the issue from a larger perspective (from a greater overview), therefore I ask for forbearance in certain paragraphs.
In ancient times, when the number of inhabitants on Earth was much lower than it is at present, people had limited possibilities. The computational power of our species was far smaller, and likewise the related technological sophistication. In order to ensure the continuous development of humanity, it was necessary to direct it in a developmental direction so that it would not destroy itself through its ignorance. The main forms of management are clearly visible even today. They can be divided into two categories: direct and indirect (simplified). If we think about a connected world in which everything affects everything, we must state the impossibility of protecting ourselves from the managing influence and acknowledge its natural basis. Either we manage, or we let ourselves be managed.
People can therefore be managed in two natural ways. Directly in the form of commands, prohibitions, violence, emotions, etc. (there are more of these tools). Indirectly in the form of a concept, that is, with ideas, stories, theories, religions, everything that is supposed to convince us of something and on the basis of which we are subsequently supposed to decide in our lives.
Managing society is not at all simple. The problem in management arises precisely from the essence of our world, that the world consists of an infinite number of consciousnesses with the same potential. If you imagine the world and at the same time the entire space as an ocean of energy, then you clearly see that every single autonomous unit has the ability to directly manage its space and the adjacent surroundings of this energy. Whether it is a dog, a cat, a human, a fish, a crayfish :))), anything.., I don't know about you, but personally I also control my body quite well and move adjacent objects :). So every single consciousness has potentially the same possibilities. What distinguishes us is only the degree of awareness, otherwise written: the level of consciousness, which also determines our starting position.
More effective management of society is conceptual (indirect). If you achieve that others believe your ideas and adopt them, they themselves will start to manage themselves according to them and change their adjacent surroundings. They will not even realize that they are under your management. Consciousnesses, however, do not adopt concepts immediately; the more bizarre the concept you offer, the longer time you need for persuasion. It is said that to change a concept of consciousness you need 25 years. The number represents the time until a new generation of people grows up, to whom you can from childhood impose your "new trend". So you need time and patience. A repeated lie becomes truth. The basic motto of every medium that says about itself that it is opinion-forming :). Now imagine that a state declared war on another state and would have to wait a full 25 years to convince its inhabitants of the need to wage a campaign against the other state. Yes, it happens, that is why today we talk about information wars, hybrid wars, but you mobilize people much faster if you give it to them in the form of a command. You start managing them directly. "Don't ask anything, just fulfill it!" "If you don't fulfill it, you'll go to jail." "It is service to the homeland!" Direct management is faster and targets "surgically", however it is very prone to failure. If for a longer time you keep telling a person what they should do, they can even be a fool, at the end of the day they become aware and rebel against you. So you achieve a counterproductive result. You piss off the fool, he kills you. Management of society requires the right ratio between direct and indirect management. In connection with the world scale we are talking about a super system. The management system is balanced (stabilized) by an artificial tool, invented very cleverly, a very long time ago, with which already in ancient times people thought about times far in the future. It is money. Money manages you directly on the basis of a concept. It is a certain mix between direct and indirect management. The more you believe the idea that one cannot live without money, the more susceptible you are to foreign management. The efficiency of management by money during history has only increased. While in older times money was not so effective, at present it is the main tool of managing society.
I digress a little...
I am fascinated by how in antiquity people realized the need to manage and lead other people in the direction of development and how they were able to plan tasks with a horizon of 1000 years and more. What am I writing about? Look at the times of the pharaohs. It was a time in which a caste of people is clearly visible that possessed knowledge far beyond the then average person. There is a story that clearly describes the sophistication of decisions with thinking about consequences into times long future. The Egyptians and the Hittites waged many wars together, it is difficult today to precisely guess the reasons and the entire context of their disputes, however after one battle, Pharaoh Ramesse (Ramses) had a monument carved where he claims how on that day he won the fight with the Hittites. Historians attribute this fact to the pharaoh's vanity, because there are undoubted proofs that at that time in the battle he lost and devastatingly. I nevertheless think that the loss in the battle was a far-sighted move of the pharaoh, far exceeding the decisions of that time. Many leaders of then Egypt took part in the battle. After the battle many Egyptians were taken into slavery, the numbers moved in the tens of thousands. The Hittites celebrated a great triumph and thought that they had finally defeated their rival, yet they themselves did not realize their own defeat. During the following generations the Hittite empire disintegrated. The captured Egyptians, since they possessed enormous knowledge, began to apply management in the Hittite empire itself. Gradually, slowly. First by their quality the slaves came into the favor of their masters, those began for merits gradually to free them, they began to found communities and later they applied for managing posts in the country. So the Hittites did not assimilate the Egyptians, but the Egyptians the Hittites. They won the battle, but lost the war. In knowledge lies power, it does not depend on the starting position. The less aware cannot influence the more aware. The level of knowledge decided. From then on peace reigned on the northern borders of Egypt. For a time, but those are already other stories. Egypt disintegrated and the whole region changed, however Egyptian management of the world did not disappear, it only transformed and adapted to the time. If you are attentive, you can see it to this day. Today it is represented by a group that we call globalists (globalists because they were aware of the necessity of globalization of resources long before others).
If therefore in the project I consider that the world is connected and the computational capacity of the species is influenced by its number, how is it possible that in antiquity castes arose among people that with their knowledge far surpassed all others? They knew how to plan far beyond one generation already in a time when people had the highest priority to multiply and eat? And that even in such a region in which the black race predominates, about which I claim that statistically it has the smallest chance to build such a complex conception of understanding the world? Either I am therefore mistaken, or try to look at the problem with sci-fi eyes. Pyramids were not built only in Egypt, with various variations they were built all over the world, from America, through Africa, Europe to Asia. Not only buildings, but trends are also found that are the same around the world, for example, in every culture from east to west bodies of babies were found that had bandaged heads in order to artificially lengthen the children's skulls. What if people artificially tried to imitate the shape of the pharaoh's head? In order to give the impression that their child belongs to a higher caste? Or only in honor of the rulers who helped people with their decisions from the beginning? The precision of the conjecture does not matter, on the introductory page of the project I ponder over the fact that what if our species is artificial intelligence? What if another civilization (civilizations) is trying to manage us in a developmental direction in order thus artificially to densify the space and together jointly obtain further computational power for solving problems far exceeding our understanding? What if the castes of pharaohs were members of other civilizations that populate ("make aware") the cosmic space? If we look at the size of the universe and its age, there can be an incredible number of those species. I can imagine that we are not the first species that is led on the path of development. If so, then it is easier to understand and imagine that they have enough experience to be able to predict the development of humanity in horizons of millennia...
What if in antiquity conceptual centers of management of society were created in individual places of the planet quite intentionally, with the aim of introducing among people diversity of decision-making? What am I writing about? About religions. Religions were for a long time representatives of indirect management of people on the planet. They contain in themselves concepts and foundations of morality. Even though they go in different directions, common intersections in information can be found in them. So what if another civilization taught people in various places various philosophies in order artificially to achieve diversity in opinions and thus create the basis for achieving contrast in the future? Contrast that has the aim of teaching us to see? Teaching us to look at the world as a whole? Teaching us cooperation? Every single religion contains in itself a section about the family, which is the basis in society. Not only is it true, but with this idea continuous growth of the population in various parts of the planet was ensured. The more of us there are, the more our possibilities rise, our computational power increases. It is nicely visible in the gradual development of our technologies. From history we know that in every area where the individual philosophies met, friction surfaces arose. At a certain time between various religions wars and struggle for managing influence arose. I say that without this contrast we could never have seen the importance of unity. Paradoxically our mistakes move us forward. So what if we can think about humanity as a social project in which members of various races, various philosophies were placed in one place so that the interaction between them would cause the awareness of the species?...
Even in today's world you can see on Earth various forms of management of society. Society is administered differently in America, in Europe, in Russia, in China, in India, in Africa, in Asia, look at the contact surface of North and South Korea. Those contrasts are clearly visible. The combination of the problem all in one boat together with the increase in resource consumption and the increase in population will in time bring us to the final contact surface on which either we will all start cooperating with each other, or our technological sophistication will ensure the extinction of our species (in the case if only a reduction of the population occurs, it will push us back in time to the Middle Ages). Personally I am an optimist. The more aware and interconnected people are, the harder it becomes to manage them centrally and auto-correction begins to function. If you write some nonsense on the web, someone will react to you who will correct you in the opinion and move you. We live in the age of becoming aware. The fact that on Earth there exist several centers of management and not only one ensures freedom in decision-making and the possibility to see the correct direction. You can introduce censorship in one country, but as long as in other countries there is free access to information, the awareness of the whole increases constantly.
So I claim that the correct direction for us is if we have the effort to decentralize the management of society. Otherwise written, to teach every single one of us to manage their life and its nearest surroundings. Knowledge needs to be brought flatly among people. Management is actually in its essence conscious living. As long as you have deficiencies in management, it is clearly visible also in your life. Bad family situation, incomplete family, arguments in the household, complexity of relationships, loneliness, there are many situations that arise from not managing management. Give up exclusively direct management of your surroundings. If you overdo it with it, your surroundings will not like you and in time you will lose any influence. Try to persuade your surroundings with arguments, learn to manage indirectly and have patience. Throw constant confrontation behind your head. Constant direct management leads to counterproductive results. Each of us must learn to be an autonomous creative element in our common world, such is our essence. If we ourselves will not be able to manage / will not be able to live, in vain we will rely on another. You can elect anyone into the government, even a person with abilities and good intentions, but if they are to be the manager of the unaware, their results will not be seen and the set goals will not be achieved. In my opinion other civilizations are also aware of the issue, therefore they try to make aware (educate, teach to independence) the cosmic space (conscious autonomous units). Our effort should be the same. The fact that we have the same possibilities and reproduction we have in our own hands is proof of our free will and the good intention of other civilizations. Anyone who would want to gain predominance over the species must first prevent it from multiplying, reduce its number, its possibilities and thereby prevent becoming aware. Found families, make aware / educate / lead to independence your sons and your daughters. The family is the basic cell in which progress in society arises. You will check the level of your knowledge about management if you raise a new autonomous unit (son/daughter), its behavior in adulthood will then be your mirror. In my opinion the meaning of life is precisely making the space aware. The more of us there are (the more conscious space there is), and the more aware we are, the greater possibilities we have, greater abilities and the faster we approach prosperity and utopia. Do not be afraid, fear (emotion) is also used only as a tool of management. A conscious person does not have to be afraid of anything. As long as you possess knowledge, it does not depend on your starting situation, you can even be a slave, but "at the end of the day" it will be you who will dominate in the management of the surroundings. If you lack knowledge, you can win in the lottery even x millions, you will not keep your resources and "at the end of the day" you will again be only a slave who is dependent on foreign management.
Project:Z is one of the attempts how to achieve awareness. It is not however the only project, e.g. in Russia they set about it on a professional level. I recommend to every single one of you to study the "concept of social security". It is expressly about study, because the texts are written quite demandingly, however they analyze the issue of management of society in detail.
Juraj Tušš
