PROJEKT:Z
The goal of this project is to change the world. A great ambition — is it even possible? So that you understand my intention, the form in which I want to achieve it, and believe in the reality of its achievement, I will, through reflections, bring closer to you the thoughts on which I rely. Before I begin, we must realise a basic thing that we must keep in mind the whole time. Roughly 7.5 billion people live in the world. Every single one of this enormous number is unique. Realistically it can be said that every person lives through his own world and understands it differently.
If you independently let a thousand people read the same text, with certain deviations each of them will understand it differently.
This follows from the fact that a person understands differently within his possibilities and abilities, within the experiences he has acquired, within the society in which he moves. There are many factors that influence his thinking and they simply have to be respected. No person lives in the eyes of another. Everyone in his life meets other situations, problems, everyone works with other information; that diversity is enormous. I realise that with my thoughts I will not address everyone; I might even offend, confuse or scandalise someone — believe me, that is not my goal. I will therefore not present my view to you, and I do not even want to, as something exact, precise, this is how it is and no other way. No, my intention is only to draw your attention to thoughts that I personally consider a foundation, from which you can then bounce in your own direction.
Anyway, I will introduce myself. My name is Juraj Tušš, born in 1987; since 2010 I have been co-owner, operator, bartender and cleaning lady :D in a bar in Senec called Česká pivnička. Work with people has given me a certain overview. I have noticed that when people solve some problem, do not understand something, wonder why things are just the way they are, they do not start from the basis of the problem, but begin somewhere in the middle, sometimes even at the end, and see only the consequence of something whose roots are elsewhere. Therefore I think it is very important if a person has a resolved foundational view especially about how the whole thing works, and by that I mean: the world, the universe and life in general. I will start with that. It is a broad topic and essentially many views of it exist, from simple to complex, but even in the present time there is no more comprehensive picture of it. In the spiritual area religions try to do this, in the scientific area scientific theories. They are sometimes so different from each other that joining them into a comprehensive whole seems impossible. The times are fast and people often have neither the time nor the desire to study hundreds of texts in order finally to create as objective a picture/opinion as possible. Everything is simplified, and in the end the majority is convinced of something that, upon a deeper look, still does not make sense.
When thinking about the basic functioning of the world, I started from three possibilities:
1/ The world (life as a whole) is finite; as it arose, so it will perish.
2/ The world is partly infinite, that is it arose and will no longer perish.
3/ The world is infinite; it always was, is and will be.
From my point of view it is worth discussing only one possibility, namely the third. Namely, when I take into account perhaps the most popular first theory about the beginning and end of the world, then upon a better look it is not only terrifying, but also unbelievably simple and liberating. For all its adherents I have one frightening “prophecy”: in about 130 years a global catastrophe will occur — on Earth the entire present generation (7.5 billion people) will die out, quite naturally — of old age, so it is completely irrelevant what problems we have, what position, it is irrelevant how it all works, because one day we will die, and with that it all ends. Life loses meaning and can be imagined as some flash in the dark. Someone will say: the meaning is to live for the children, to leave another generation; hm, all right, and what about those who cannot have children? A lost generation? Perhaps, but I do not think so. There is no reason to philosophise, it is time to have fun :D. Yes, this too is a real possibility, so all the stresses, the chase after career, money etc. are only nonsense (a filling of our free time) that we invented ourselves and with which we burdened ourselves. Nothing deep, everything as simple as a slap, and here I would finish.
I admit that with the second possibility I could not lean on anything as to why something should arise from nothing and function to infinity. Okay, I realise my understanding is limited, therefore when forming an opinion I try to lean on my own experiences, what I have already lived through in life, what I have observed, and so on.
I consider experiences the main test of correctness in life.
If I live through something, or long-term observe it in my life, I am convinced that it is so. True, experiences also have their limit; I cannot after all try everything, live through everything; in any case so far in my life I have not observed a single thing that functions on the principle “from now until forever”, but perhaps you have, I do not know.
I come to number three, that is life (the world as a whole) is infinite, it always was, is and will be. What plays in favour of this theory is knowledge from elementary school. In the physics lesson we learned the law of conservation of energy, where it is written: energy neither arises nor perishes, it only transforms. It was the first definition in my life confirming that I will not understand life just like that. What then is that energy? I do not know, but I imagine the whole world composed of it. Upon a deeper look we would find that we are swimming in a sea of energy. Somewhere this sea is thinner and somewhere denser; namely all (seemingly) matter is only condensed energy. Energy however tells me only about the construction of the world, its main building unit; it does not give me an answer to what is essential, and that is that incredible complexity, complicatedness and at the same time “simplicity”, that organisational miracle which the world is. Some people do not see organisation in it and attribute everything to chance. The organisation that I see in the world is incredible and yet it seems to me that it functions on relatively simple principles. So that you better understand what I am getting at, I must digress to my own experience, which I assume you have as well. For the time I have been in the world I perceive, observe and can state that my body changes. Up to a certain age it grows and later it withers. This physiological change of the body however in no way influences my view of the world, that is how I perceive reality. It seems to me as if I have been looking at the world still the same as when I was a child, or at any age. Of course, the experiences I have acquired, the information I collect over that time, influence my decisions, my opinions, but the perception of reality, consciousness, is still the same and does not change at all. I want to say by this: what if consciousness is that which is infinite, in which everything arises, and energy is its building unit that creates everything? Or, what if consciousness is the space in which everything arises and its thought determines what is created from energy in the space? There may be more of these possibilities, but the point remains the same. Okay, if it is so, it is still strange, because as I mentioned in the introduction, there are many people in the world, and not only people — autonomy (uniqueness, independence) is easily observed also in animals, plants, so there is an incredible number of these consciousnesses here for them to create harmony and one whole just like that. But what if the whole world functions similarly to the internet?
It must be realised that every functioning technology proceeds from the laws of nature, or from the principle of its functioning.
So what is the internet? An abstract concept of a whole; it is the interconnection of a multitude of individual devices (computers, servers, and anything) that communicate with each other and together create an information network. So what if everything is interconnected with everything and an exchange of information constantly takes place, which forms an enormous network/world? You may say, but then everyone would have to know everything, he is after all connected to one network. Yes, except that the capacity of the device is conditioned by the type (kind) of the device, hence the inability of people to understand everything, to know everything. To absorb an “infinite” volume of data into one’s memory and create one’s own picture is similar to a situation as if I tried to copy the volume of data on the internet into one desktop computer. On the other hand, however, I notice that if a person concentrates on some problem, directs attention to a certain part, he always knows how to find a solution. There is an incredible number of people and their testimonies, for it to be some (let us say) statistical error, who in life met with an inspiration. That is, they were in a situation from which they did not know how to help themselves, so they prayed, or began to meditate, or merely concentrated (call it whatever you want), received an idea that they had no way of knowing from where, and they managed to solve/overcome the problem. Best of all the pioneers of science and technology could tell us about this, or people who invented something from nothing. Personally however I think that every one of us has met with a similar situation. So theoretically yes, we have access to all data, but we can use only a part of them at once. So in order to understand at least the basic connections, we must properly simplify reality. Let us therefore try to imagine the world as an incredible number of autonomous units (consciousnesses) that are interconnected, share information with each other in a certain way and through feedback create one common network, one whole (the world). More precisely, it is a network of an enormous number of networks of various sizes, because every single consciousness (autonomous unit) creates its own network, with its own capacity, at least that is how it appears in nature. Let us take for example us, the human body; I can say with certainty I have only one consciousness, but the units that create the shape of my body and form me are an unbelievable number — cells, atoms, quarks… In my body it seems there is space for them comparable in size with our universe. It is all only a question of the scale at which I look at the world.
I like to play with the thought that the world is formed by a network of an infinite number of universes (autonomous units).
A property of the universe that we must not forget and that is scientifically proven: the universe in which we live is constantly expanding. In my words, the universe constantly expands and creates a larger and denser network. The intention is easy to imagine. The larger the network, the more storage for data and the volume of transmitted information increases. The world thus becomes constantly more complicated and more miraculous. I therefore say: autonomous units constantly arise, or are created for the purpose of increasing the possibilities and abilities of the whole. The exact principle of arising or creation, so that energy balance is preserved, I will not tell you, I do not know. It seems as if there existed only one consciousness that constantly fractally divides into an infinite number of consciousnesses with the same energy potential.
It is also necessary to notice that these autonomous units (consciousnesses) go through their own development. Upon creation they do not reach the qualities of previous units, they start from scratch, they have their own position in space, they have their own path, and until they acquire enough information, through experiences, to create their own complex network, a certain time it takes. Really? Does it take time? I will digress a little. Automatically, when I think about the infinity of the world, I must run into the problem of time. Does it even exist? Right in the introduction I write, what if the world always was, is and will be; I use past, present and future because people have already grown used to these concepts and help themselves with them. More precisely however I should write only that the world IS. Why? I think that the present tense is the only real one that actually exists. Past and future do not exist; they are only illusory concepts that we interchange for human abilities. In this statement I again proceed from my own experience. For my entire life I have not lived through anything other than the present.
Any moment whatsoever takes place in the present.
Even now, when I write the text, or when you read it. Memory (the ability of a person to store his experiences) does allow me to return to what was lived and visualise it anew; seemingly it appears to me as the past, yet even that visualisation takes place in the present. When I think about last year’s holiday, I think about it again only now, not yesterday. The ability to plan, to presuppose, which is the basic tool for creation, again allows me to visualise something that could be part of my life but is not yet, therefore it is only seemingly a matter of the future. I warn you, when in my business I make an action of the type: tomorrow everything free, do not let yourselves be caught, because tomorrow when you come, it will already be today :D. Nothing happens in the past or in the future; there is still only the present here, which constantly changes, transforms (exactly like energy, hmm, and perhaps that is related). I return to the diversity and the creation of consciousnesses. What do I mean when I write that autonomous units do not reach the qualities of previous units and start from scratch? After all the opposite seems to be true. You will say, whenever a new child is born, the features of the parents are clearly visible on it. That is after all proof of the influence, development and advancement of autonomous units onto their next generation. Either I am therefore mistaken, or try to look at it with other eyes. What if it must be taken into account that autonomous units (consciousnesses) do NOT arise by the reproduction of their carriers/bodies (people, animals, plants…), but arise somewhere else, at a more elementary level? In the world they start from the simplest conscious life forms and by gaining experiences, raising their level of awareness, they gradually reincarnate into more complex life forms (more precisely it should be written: consciousnesses according to the level of their awareness create their own network/carrier). I am writing about a certain form of reincarnation. So if we currently find ourselves in a human body, I assume that we all already have a great deal lived through behind us.
Body and consciousness must be separated.
Bodies perhaps reproduce according to a programmed pattern, an algorithm, and the predispositional abilities of a newly born body are visible, but consciousnesses arise independently, autonomously from any physical influences. Perhaps it is precisely because consciousness creates its body, its reality, and not the other way around. In the case of people, when a sperm penetrates an egg, perhaps it only supplies the missing energy needed to create a new body, but the plan of creation is held in the hands of the consciousness to which it was thus enabled to materialise. It is hard to talk about the “miracle of birth” only in the theoretical plane, since there may be several variants. For a better explanation observed experiences must help me. Notice for example at the birth of a child its uniqueness; yes, physically it resembles the parents, it also has their inborn abilities according to the gene pool, perhaps a little adjusted/mixed, but situations in life it always solves with its own head, it goes its own way, never the one of its parent. If the child spends a longer time with the parents, its behaviour may also be influenced by the behaviour of the parents, but that does not mean that in its life a situation/experience will not arise that will finally influence it so much that it decides to go independently its own way. Personally I consider it a mistake when a parent in the framework of upbringing does not take into account the uniqueness of his child and tries to force the child at all costs to go in his footsteps, according to his ideas, when he claims the right to decide about it and constantly argues with ownership of the child — it is my child I can raise it as I want, I am older and more experienced, I know what is good for it! Really your child? Yes, by conceiving it you enabled it to create a shell, but with its consciousness you did absolutely nothing. Really? Are you older and more experienced? Here one must realise the possibility that you, your consciousness, may for example be a first entry (incarnation) into a human body and your child may already have more of those incarnations behind it, therefore paradoxically it is not you who is experienced, but your child. I would not write about this if I had not in life met parents who by their behaviour rather reminded me of children and if I had not met their children who rather reminded me of adults. Look for example also at how every single new human generation is more aware/better than the previous one; it is a natural development of autonomous units (consciousnesses). It is not at all a matter of the development of their physical abilities; after all world records at the Olympics do not change with every generation, but it is a matter of the development of consciousnesses, because knowledge and technologies change constantly.
So I say that the world is a network composed of an enormous number of autonomous units that constantly communicate with each other (exchange information in real time) and together through feedback create reality. The quality of reality depends on the level of the individual consciousnesses (autonomous units), therefore new consciousnesses are constantly created and they increase the transmitted volume of data, which makes reality more complex and more miraculous. Everything happens in present real time, so the speed of the potential development of consciousnesses does not depend on time, but on the quality of information (acquired by one’s own experience) transmitted by the network. Simple. If everything is as I write, it would mean that we are capable in real time of changing our reality, of shifting the quality of many consciousnesses to a higher level, and that only thanks to the spreading of the needed information, in our case already by the created artificial network — the internet. That will also be the main task of my project, to spread information. You may still think that this is nonsense, reality cannot be changed for the better only thanks to interconnection and the spreading of information, it functions after all completely differently and the world is ruled by bad and powerful people who prevent us from joy and happiness :D. In order to convince you, I must draw your attention to the problematique of good and evil. What are these abstract concepts good and evil? I will try to define them in my way. I have noticed how in older sources these concepts are compared to light and to darkness, and not at all rarely. Even with such intensity that I ask myself whether between the pairs light — darkness / good — evil we cannot put an equals sign. If it were so, if the experiences of our ancestors really indicated the same principle of functioning between the concepts, another relevant question would be in place, whether evil exists at all. Namely if I sought the answer in science and looked more closely at the problematique of light and darkness, it seems to me that even darkness does not exist at all. How so? Simply, we cannot measure it in any way. How do we find out how great the darkness is for example in a sack? By measuring with an instrument how many lux there are in the sack, but lux is after all a unit of light. Darkness has no unit of its own, so darkness is only a concept that tells us about the absence of light. Evil is a state when good is absent and personally I also assume that similarly it holds for the pair ignorance — knowledge (just for interest: people, bearers of knowledge, used to be called also the enlightened, why do you think?), so ignorance is only a lack of knowledge. On one side we have light, good, knowledge, on the other darkness, evil, ignorance. Do you understand what I mean? Whereby I do not doubt the existence of one side, paradoxically I do doubt its opposite. I return to the definition of good and evil. According to me evil is a state when KNOWLEDGE is absent.
In other words, we do not “fight” with evil, but with stupidity.
People are not bad, they are unaware. No person is bad; the measure of his knowledge and awareness determines the kind of his behaviour. Is it really so? Let us look at it again with the help of experiences. If a person kills a person e.g. because of property, he does not do so out of passion, he does so from the conviction that by appropriating someone else’s savings his life will improve; the same holds for thieves. Or otherwise, if someone bullies, mocks, or when one slanders another, it only testifies to his not having appropriated the knowledge of equality among individual autonomous units and the principle of their functioning. There are many of these examples and combinations of unaware actions. Conversely, aware action, a higher measure of knowledge, awareness, consciousness, we designate by an abstract concept (which we ourselves often do not even understand) love.
Love means seeing in the other the same potential as in oneself, taking into account the difference of level and realising that together we form one common network — the world.
The truth is that in the world I also notice the existence of a sophisticated “evil”. An evil that tries to influence people consciously, uses a high level of knowledge to gain influence and to achieve its goal. This “evil” however is never the executor of its thoughts. It has as if clean hands, because all the dirty work for it is done by others, the less aware, who believe it, fall under its influence and who then subsequently bear the consequences of their deeds. In place is the question whether an environment full of contrast between good and evil, knowledge and ignorance is not being created for us intentionally. Whether the evil that I describe does not paradoxically have as its goal the development of society and the raising of its awareness. From my point of view it would be a very effective way of educating consciousnesses (autonomous units), namely it is precisely contrast that enables us to see and distinguish. While a fish swims in water, it does not know that water exists; it finds it out only when it emerges above the surface and by its own experience feels the “contrast” (difference) between water and air. I therefore perceive life on Earth as a school where conditions are created for the development of individual consciousnesses, and where consciousnesses on the basis of their own experiences, trials and errors, raise their level. Upon a deeper look we find that the teaching places great emphasis on every autonomous unit coming to awareness in its own way and at its own pace; that is the basis for diversity and a confirmation of free will.
Who then is the teacher, the creator of contrast in this school? I warn you, we find ourselves in a somewhat sci-fi paragraph (perhaps only a –fi paragraph :D); I repeat, it does not have to be true, it is only a certain assumption, a reflection; precision is not important, but the point. What if the teacher is some other advanced race, or advanced races, indeed what if people are a creation of these races? In other words, what if we are artificial intelligence? Already when I proceed from the data of our scientists (from our understanding) about the size of our universe and about its age, where the figures move in the billions, and when I look at how people in the 21st century still try to find within our planet a place on Earth where life is not, is absent, it comes out to me that life forms are very adaptive and quickly adjustable with a relatively rapid development. A hundred thousand years is in the scale of the universe almost no number; if we compare planets with a deviation of arising of a hundred thousand years, we call them twins. Now try to imagine that on another planet (and there are plenty of those planets) life arose earlier “only” by a hundred thousand years — how much more advanced must a possible civilisation be than ours, when we by development in 5,000 years got from using spears to the production of atomic bombs? What if other civilisations developed far before us and mastered technologies of which we do not even yet dream? According to my assumption, the key to their success and development must have been the understanding of the basic principle of the functioning of the world, that the world functions as a network and the more complex and denser the network, the more beneficial the impact on the whole (therefore they perhaps also try to densify it artificially). Also the assumption of a high awareness of the races indicates to me that among them love prevails and not hatred. That would perhaps explain why we are still not hunched before them and used as a labour force, or as an attraction in some circus. Just take us and our level of understanding, what do we do to lower forms of life? Well, we ruthlessly use them to our advantage, we eat them, we simply take them as a thing and at the same time we pretend that this is correct. We wave some law of nature and only defend ourselves. If it were a law of nature, we ourselves would long ago have been an energy source for other civilisations. They would have not the slightest need to hide from us; their technological dominance would prevent us any resistance. The fact that people are allowed to live freely, to go their own way, to develop in their own direction on their own planet, may testify either to the non-existence of more advanced civilisations, or if they existed, there is no possibility of how to get to us, or they exist, they know how to get to us, but they care about our own development. By their own presence they do not want to influence us, since they realise that the preservation of autonomy/uniqueness is the only path that leads to diversity and at the same time to an increase of the performance of the whole. How to find out which possibility it is? Let us try to look into the world. How many observations and testimonies of UFOs have been reported all over the world since the 1930s of the last century? I will not evaluate how many of them are false, mistakes and so on; it is enough for me if there exists only one observation that is proof of the existence of another civilisation. Does it exist? I do not know, I leave that to your consideration.
For a moment let us assume that yes, another more advanced civilisation really exists; why then does it hide from us? Why does it not use its advanced technologies for our teaching, or why does it not directly present us its knowledge with which it would accelerate our development? Well because autonomy, diversity, variety must be preserved; only thus do we achieve an effective development of the whole. Moreover development would certainly not accelerate, quite the contrary, there would be a threat that humanity with new technologies would destroy itself. Every autonomous unit has its own pace of development, its own path. Jumps in development must not be made, because then we are witnesses of counterproductive results. Just look at what happened when we were allowed to invent nuclear energy. A technology so that we cover the energy consumption of a still growing humanity. Obviously we were not ready for it at that time, since we immediately produced two nuclear bombs and threw them on our own cities. The level difference between the knowledge of people and another civilisation simply does not enable us to meet with them, therefore they “segregate”. I will write it otherwise: imagine that you set yourself the goal of raising the level of consciousness of a tiger; believe me, if you spent more time personally in its environment, it would eat you :D. Another example we have right under our nose; even on Earth we see level differences among human races, among white, black, yellow and red; until they reach a similar level of consciousness, they cannot be integrated into one society, otherwise various kinds of problems arise among them. In the past this was more visible when each race had at its disposal its own continent, or part of a continent; they naturally segregated/separated from each other. Therefore as long as the level of consciousness in people does not reach at least the boundary of the knowledge that the universe is interconnected and that it matters for each one to achieve his own development (otherwise written: love does not prevail <3 :D), it is not possible for us to meet with other civilisations, or for us to get to the use of advanced technologies. For the progress of humanity it is very important to get beyond this level. This project is to be one of many attempts at how to reach the boundary.
I do not want to be a bad “prophet”, but if we do not reach the boundary in time, if we do not stop competing/rivaling among ourselves and do not begin to cooperate together, we will face enormous challenges, indeed we will be witnesses of terrible horrors. Boo-boo-boo, what is it about? One must think that we all swim through the universe on one ship — on Earth; the growth of population (and I do not even mention the problematique of the ship itself) is much higher than the current development of our energy devices. The level of our used technology is not sufficient for a long-term sustainable development of society. The present economy tries to manoeuvre between the number of the population and its optimal consumption; that the economy is not managing it is visible every year. More and more people do not have access to sufficient resources, in other words people are becoming poorer and poorer. You will say it is because many millionaires live in the world, multinational companies that suck the economy dry and they are to blame. Hm, but is it really so? Why then do they not invest their acquired resources further and return them back into the economy? Because they are misers and greedy bla-bla-bla… I am not arguing; certainly resources could also be redistributed more justly and more effectively, but the point is elsewhere. Try to look at the problem with other eyes. Imagine that the means that belong to large corporations and are at the moment as if frozen in accounts, or invested in virtual markets, suddenly got into circulation. People would have as much money as they wanted, and what would that have as a consequence? An immediate rise in the consumption (of resources) of mineral raw materials and energy on planet Earth. Earth would be plundered within a year. We would be like locusts. We would have everything we wanted, yes, but we would also have an environment unsuitable for life and we would still be buried in waste. The task of the economy is to regulate the consumption of energy and raw materials on planet Earth; in what form this happens is not essential.
As long as humanity does not dispose of the needed advanced technologies, on Earth real prosperity will never be possible.
Until then people will try (according to the level of knowledge) to invent an alternative of development. It seems to me that at present some people see the best way of how to solve our problem in the reduction of population (the so-called plan of the golden billion). The reduction is at the same time not planned to be carried out unnoticed, non-violently; for a while one can sterilise, but if you look at any graph of the growth of population for recent periods and you see there that exponential curve, you will understand that one cannot fight with life in the long term. Therefore I rather think that we are threatened by mass dying, in the form of wars, diseases, natural disasters.
According to how we think, the real level of our understanding is visible. Instead of using our potential, which grows with our number, and beginning to cooperate among ourselves, interconnecting heads and using the obtained performance for the development of new technologies enabling survival, possible resettlement, travel through the universe, instead of that we think about our self-destruction. We will not make the needed technological progress until we change the state of our thinking; namely it is important to understand that no more advanced group of scientists (or a more advanced civilisation :D) will allow a monkey to hold a submachine gun in its hand. Actually, I saw a video on the internet where people did that; I do not know whether it was a fake video or reality, but it amused me how that monkey almost shot them :D. Therefore, until we reach the needed level of awareness, we will be prevented from further energy-technological progress and they will rather cook and stew us in our own juice than risk giving us the needed technologies into our hands and by our ignorance we would endanger the existence of our common world; namely I assume that future technologies will function on the basic principles of the functioning of reality. One need not however be too frightened; personally I am an optimist. Already the mere fact that in an atmosphere of competition we managed to invent one common network and thus interconnected the world gives me great hope that we will be able to avoid the worst scenarios. Even if not, as it is said, everything bad is good for something, therefore if possible catastrophes (or mistakes of humanity) do not exceed a fatal boundary, by their negative effects they will help us to mature.
It can be said that the development of consciousness is an objective process, it cannot be stopped, but there are many ways of how to achieve it.
How do I imagine an optimistic future? (Again a little –fi :D). I am convinced that people right after the breakthrough in thinking, in reaching a new level of consciousness, together with our scientists will make great breakthroughs in science and in the research of new technologies. They will enable us to stabilise the ecosystem on the planet, guarantee us energy security and prolong the time needed for resettlement, or for the creation of a new temporary artificial planet. Wait, what? An artificial planet? Yes, the resources for that certainly exist; after all we claim that we swim in a sea of energy; the only thing that in the life of the world will not run out is energy. The challenge will be to invent a technology that will enable us to obtain unlimited energy from space, to materialise it and to invent a technology of the recycling of this energy. It could be the task perhaps still of my generation. If we succeed, all the other present problems will cease to exist. Certainly further problems will arise that cannot now be foreseen, but by involving our entire network in the solution of the situation we will overcome the problems with ease. We will become creators of our own reality, and I assume that we will begin to join our teachers in the creation and teaching of new artificial intelligences, new races. Ah, I almost forgot, and of course truth and love will prevail :D :D :D.
Okay, enough of the visualisation of the future. The future has an infinite number of variants; it depends how many autonomous units incline to which variant at a given moment. It is good to have a goal in life, but as it is said: to go after it and look at it with both eyes always stinks of tripping over the kerb :D. It is always necessary to concentrate on the present situation, on the present.
The present represents access to connecting to the network; from here creativity, new thoughts and solutions spring.
The mistake of the present time is that omnipresent haste. People unconsciously and incorrectly use their abilities. They overload their memory with the past and past grievances, instead of it serving them for learning from already acquired experiences. They overload their ability to plan and visualise by getting lost in time, by creating virtual realities, by thinking too much about future duties, instead of using it to imagine solutions of their present problems and to achieve their goals. Just to be sure people are not even much in the present; they do not have time for such a luxury, they after all have a pile of duties they must think about. We chase after resources and do not realise that we have been swimming in them the whole time. All the unconscious bad habits of behaviour then result in the inability to see an alternative to the present unsatisfactory state. Literally the saying holds: the truth is so close that it cannot be seen. The key to self-development and at the same time to solving our problem is found precisely in the present. Notice, every spiritual exercise is aimed at being present. Here and now. Learn to concentrate on the activities that you are just doing; it will bring a new quality into your life and enable you to realise your dreams. You can do anything you can imagine. Live your life in real time, be attentive, awake and notice your mistakes. Attention reveals unconscious bad habits of behaviour.
The realisation of mistakes is the main foundation for their correction.
Look at your neighbour as a colleague and not as a competitor. Do not forget, both of you have the same potential; a difference of level does not mean someone’s superiority. Have understanding and comprehension; being at a higher level than your neighbour does not mean that you should use him, but rather help him get to a higher level. In the interest of all of us is to raise the level, to raise the performance of the network. Do not be afraid to use new technologies that connect us. Help yourselves with information from the internet, use the technology of interconnected heads. Do not be frightened at all by hoaxes, disinformation, conspiracies and untruth. Have an open mind for all available thoughts. Yourselves with the help of experiences you will easily be able to filter lie from truth. Even if not, the contrast between truth and stupidity will gradually lead you to a new level of awareness. Do not forget the biblical saying: the light shines in the darkness and the darkness did not overcome it. A lower level can never influence a higher level of consciousness, therefore the old folk fairy-tale saying also holds: Good always prevails over evil. Think about it: if good and evil (knowledge and ignorance, light and darkness) were to be opposites and a balance were to prevail between them, never could anyone state the victory of one of the sides. One need not therefore be afraid of stupidity and we must not at all attempt to introduce censorship on stupidity. All information has its justification; either it gives you something, or the lived consequence of believing in nonsense will force you to think.
In conclusion I will only bring my project closer to you. Why do I not call it a blog, but a project? Namely it consists of two phases. In the first theoretical one I will try with the help of the internet to spread my thoughts through articles to as wide a part of the population as possible, to persuade people to mutual cooperation and thus to obtain the needed influence for organising a network of people with a similar view (with the same level). In the second practical phase I will try with the already created network of people to solve practical problems of life and with further real projects to build a new reality, to build a new world. I realise it may be a long-term project. Its success depends on the quality of the information provided. Your reaction will directly influence the speed of the realisation of the project. I sincerely believe that together we will succeed in great things. I believe that we will learn to use our enormous potential for our common benefit. Project:Z is to be the project of the last generation that lived on this planet unaware. May we succeed.
Let’s keep our fingers crossed, friends!
Juraj Tušš
