11/ TECHNOLOGIES OF THE FUTURE
The attempt to estimate the technologies of the future, the development path that humanity will take, may at first glance seem senseless, unrealistic, and the result may appear very imprecise. After all, how can we “predict” the future when we clearly see that there are so many creative individuals among us, and theoretically each one of them can influence the whole to such an extent as to divert it from the current course of development (Butterfly effect)? In my article, despite the initial scepticism, I will try to outline possible variants of our path and explain to you how it is possible to imagine one’s future relatively precisely (in its foundations).
I am by no means the first who attempts to predict the future. The past has presented us with personalities whose works we often label as almost prophetic. Personally, I was greatly inspired by Charlie Chaplin with his film Modern Times. In it he depicted relatively precisely not only technology but also the development of behaviour in society in later times. Coincidence? I do not think so. In predicting the future and future social manifestations it is necessary to start from the foundations of the functioning of our world; that is, it is necessary to correctly understand the principles that apply in our world and with their help estimate our direction. Every single technology is based on the foundations of life. Every single scientist and pioneer must be a concentrated observer of nature, of our world. Chaplin observed the world correctly and therefore presented to the audience in a comedic form a relatively precise idea of the future.
In my project I have simplified all philosophies (ideologies) into two basic conceptions:
1/ Individualism (Big Bang, random arrangement of the world, animal law, chaos…)
2/ Collectivism (a never-beginning and never-ending interconnected world)
How do we find out which conception is the true one on which one should rely and which is only illusory? By observation – by practice. If we look at the world from the correct angle (through the correct conception), new horizons open up to us; more humanly written, we become creative in our thinking. Philosophy is very closely related to science. As long as some ideology limits you, narrows you in your thinking, then the set limits have a direct impact on the precision of the results of your scientific work. In our world we can see both macro scales (planets, galaxies, universe) and micro scales (cells, atoms, quarks). Contemporary science has a huge problem connecting these two worlds. It seems to them that what applies in the macro world does not apply in the micro and vice versa. Researchers were thus forced to create more natural-science disciplines (physics, chemistry, biology…) in order to be able to describe the observable world with them. Their problem is that they rely on a wrong conception of thinking and by means of various constants try to fit formulas (or even whole theories) so that they do not deny their ideology, but also so that they roughly match laboratory observations – tests. I want to say by this that we still have many imprecise and overly simplified formulas with numbers that came out of laboratory observations, and that only so that we would not deny our set ideology stemming from the conception of individualism (Big Bang). In my opinion the best-known and most basic simplified formula in physics is the formula E=mc². The formula that tells us about energy, about the main foundation of our world. In my project I often draw attention to the two absolutely main foundations of our world: energy and information. While energy represents the main building unit in the world, information in my opinion interconnects our world and is the main representative of feedback. In my prediction of the future I will therefore rely mainly on these two planes, energy and information. All other planes of progress (paths of development) stem from these two main ones.
In the contemporary world the hunt for energy sources is enormous; our technology allows us to extract and process energy only with limited efficiency – with a large amount of waste. From the imperfection of our extraction, recycling, with the increase of the population on the planet and the increase of consumption, the possibilities of obtaining resources gradually diminish for us, competition increases, we become clogged with waste, which ultimately has a very negative impact on our environment. Inventing a new source of clean energy will be a key moment in the development of humanity. Where to find such a source? In nature. Attention should be focused either on the core of a star, the core of the Earth (planets), the core of a galaxy, or the core of an atom. These are different scales, but if we admit the possibility that the universe divides fractally (in every scale we observe the same pattern), then the principles apply across all scales. Let us take the formula E=mc²; it tells us about the relationship between energy and mass. Hmm, but what does the speed of light c do in the formula? Then another question arises: what actually is mass? It is necessary to realize that the world is in constant motion. The theorem about energy also tells us this: energy neither arises nor disappears, it only constantly transforms. Every single moment is different, everything moves, everything turns, everything changes, and it seems that all of this happens at the speed of light. How so? We run into the problem of measuring speed. We can always measure speed only with respect to something – to the Earth, to the Sun, to the road, to the centre of the galaxy, etc.; it does not matter, it always has to be a closed measuring system. Only for it do the known formulas apply, because in reality, when you move in any way, whether you are aware of it or not, you absolutely perform a theoretically very, very, very fast movement. To your movement you must add the speed of the Earth on which you stand, which rotates at a certain speed, the speed of the Sun which pushes our Earth in rotation around the centre of the galaxy, add the speed of the centre of the galaxy which in turn turns around something, etc. We could add for a very, very long time and in the end a number might come out that would tell us that we moved at the speed of light. Philosophical question: If everything moves at the speed of light, does it move at all? Closed systems are important in our world; otherwise the world would look like a blur that would probably seem not to move at all. What constitutes a closed system in our world? Cores, sources of gravity. Cores of galaxies, stars, planets, atoms. The challenge of future human progress will be to correctly understand what happens in the core and subsequently we will have to be able to imitate this process. We must investigate the plane of energy and the plane of information simultaneously. They are very much related. Information interconnects closed systems and modifies them. In the project I write in a simplified way about autonomous units. What am I writing about? Look for example at us, at our organism, the human body – how many atoms make it up, how many closed systems? And yet we function as one whole, an informational whole whose size is bounded by our consciousness. From this point of view the world really seems to be like consciousness, like a space that is parcelled into xyz spaces/consciousnesses on various scales. It is assumed that the informational field/consciousness/space is only one and the difference that appears to us is caused by a different position in space, by acquiring different experiences, by observing a different perspective. Otherwise written, I assume that if I were in your skin, in your place and experienced the experiences that you experience, then I would behave exactly the same as you. And you, if you were in my place, would behave the same as I. Diversity in the world stems from different position (observed perspective) and from different “size” of autonomous units. The world constantly expands and creates new space, new consciousnesses, new points of observation, acquires new information into a common database. This database then influences all the autonomous units included in it. Nothing in the world can be kept secret; he who seeks finds.
I have digressed a little; I will return to information. As I wrote, clean energy is located in the core. If we look into the core of a galaxy, we observe a large black hole in it. The hypothesis suggests that if we understand the issue of black holes, we will also understand the issue of atomic nuclei, and vice versa. From observations of black holes it is visible that a black hole not only sucks in matter (energy) but “on the other side” “creates” it. It is assumed that in a black hole bodies rotate at enormous speed which by their rotation create an enormous electromagnetic field and at the same time create as much matter (energy) as they absorb. It is a certain recycling mechanism of energy in our world. The rotation of the bodies is so strong that on paper black holes come out as two-dimensional objects. Figuratively as a flattened rotating matrix. On the smallest scales objects again appear to us as one-dimensional points (pixels). I assume, however, that these our calculations are imprecise or distorted by the enormous difference between the observed scales. The world creates three-dimensional bodies – spheres/balls on all scales. In order to avoid inequalities in observation we had to create another natural-science discipline – chemistry. If we look into the nucleus of an atom, we again see rotating particles (protons and neutrons) which by their rotation create the nuclear force that is the source of an electromagnetic field a hundred thousand times larger than the nucleus of the atom itself. This field delimits the size of the whole atom, so the shell that constitutes empty space and in which the negatively charged electrons are located predominates a hundred thousand times over the nucleus, which is the source of “mass”, gravity and positive charge. The interaction of the positively charged nucleus with the negatively charged electrons we call electric force. Our world is electromagnetic. I am not a scientist, but something about the topic could be told to us by the pioneer of the 19th–20th century – Nikola Tesla. The similarity of the issue of black holes and the atomic nucleus is not accidental.
As the first key technology of the future that is a source of clean energy I consider the nucleus. The challenge will be to understand the nucleus and to imitate it. Disappointment? Perhaps you will say that nuclear technology is already here and we can already see it applied in practice (nuclear power plants, for example). Yes, but at present we are only at the beginning of the path. Our power plants are under development and are only the first, second, perhaps third generation of progress. They work on the release of energy from the nuclei of unstable isotopes (e.g. enriched uranium), by their fission (whereby waste arises – in the form of “spent” fuel) they heat water which evaporates and the steam subsequently turns a turbine which “produces” electrical energy. Our higher goal is to imitate the processes in the nucleus so that we succeed in generating energy but at the same time also recycling energy, so that the process becomes infinite and stable. In short, our goal is to imitate the functioning of black holes. Industry will decentralize in the future. Hand in hand with this technology will come the technology of antigravity. If we understand the electromagnetism of our world and obtain a source of clean energy from the nucleus, we will lift all our intercity means of transport into the air. We will forever solve the problem of terrestrial infrastructure which costs us large energy resources because of its constant maintenance, burdens our environment and is an enormous problem for many animal species (animals – autonomous units of a “lower category” – than us). Everyone will have their own flying car with a forever full tank. We will begin to discover and “colonize” space.
What actually is that antigravity? Is it only a myth, a technology invented by the film industry? No; to understand it it is enough if you imagine it as magnetism (two same charges repel each other / different charges attract each other). Proof can perhaps be seen every evening in the sky – the Moon. After all, how is it that the Moon does not fall? How is it that it does not fly away? How is it that it does not rotate around its own axis? The answer we will find if we look again at the issue of nuclei and at the mutual interaction between nuclei. Rotation in the nucleus of an atom creates gravity (nuclear force) with always a positive charge. Two atoms thus naturally pull away from each other and at the same time thanks to the shell attract each other, yet never in nature does a joining of atomic nuclei occur (fusion / under normal circumstances). Nuclei know how to mutually influence their shells which are negatively charged. In the shells there are namely negatively charged electrons. The interaction between the nucleus and the shell we call electricity; between different nuclei and different shells – information. How does this relate to the Moon? Let us ask further. Why do planets have their orbits around their star? Why do moons have orbits around their planets? (Bear in mind that orbits are not ellipses but spirals – that is a more complex movement). You can perhaps answer the questions that it is because of the gravity of the Sun/planets, but why then does the Sun never swallow the planets? Similarly as when you empty a bathtub full of water? At present we explain the origin of the solar system as the concentration of interstellar matter…, that is gas and dust contracted by their own gravity and in its centre the Sun arose and around it the planets. But what if the reality is different and all planets gradually arose from the Sun and all suns (stars) gradually from the core of the galaxy (black hole)? Do nuclei multiply? Another scientific discipline that investigates our world by observing the interaction of physics, chemistry and consciousness is biology. In biology the basic building unit is the cell; in physics and chemistry the atom/nucleus. I ask, am I not writing to you all the time about the same thing, only on a different scale? What if nuclei under the influence of consciousness “multiply” similarly to cells? By mitosis and amitosis? That is, in the nuclei a constant process of division takes place? Of course, one must always take into account the scale we have in mind, because if we look at very large objects the duration of the division may seem infinite to us, and if we look at very small objects the multiplication may seem very fast (at the speed of light). One must always be careful of the distortion of observation at too distant scales. I want to say by this: what if the nuclei of planets arose from the nucleus of the Sun and the nuclei of moons from the nuclei of planets? Let us not forget: energy neither arises nor disappears, it only constantly transforms. It is assumed that just as the nucleus of the Sun grows and at the same time also the Sun, so the nuclei of planets grow and at the same time also the planets. Stars as well as planets appear to be hollow. Many tests have been carried out (even the Moon was shot at) and it was found that moons, planets, even stars (the Sun) resonate like bells. The property is related to the nucleus and the hundred-thousand-times larger shell. It looks as if in the nucleus of a star/planet bodies rotate which constantly create energy/matter and store it in the shell; the empty space between the nucleus and the shell is caused by the nuclear force. The shell of a planet/star constantly enlarges up to a critical value when the nucleus is no longer able by its gravitational force to hold the accumulated matter in the shell. At this moment the shell of matter is disrupted and in the case of planets gas giants arise (in the case of stars – supernovas). The process is caused by the different speed of the creation of matter in the nucleus and in the “growth” of the nucleus. The nucleus of a planet “grows” more slowly and in a different way. From time to time – the rotating bodies in the nucleus create a new rotating pair. The original nucleus and the newly arisen nucleus mutually repel each other (they have the same positive charge); a transfer of the newly arisen nucleus towards the shell occurs until it reaches the boundary when it jumps away outside the shell of the original nucleus. A new body arises with its own shell, with its own orbit (in the case of a star a planet, in the case of a planet a moon). In the initial phase the influence of the gravity of the original nucleus is still large and prevents the rotational movement of the shell of the newly arisen nucleus. We can also see this phase on our Moon. The Moon does not fall on us because of electromagnetism; it does not rotate and does not fly away because of the action of the Earth’s gravity. The Earth and the Moon mutually, every year, evenly move away from each other. I think it is a value around 4 cm per year. The value reflects the mutual difference in the growth of nuclear forces. 4 cm is not much, but one should not consider the growth as linear. If you want to see with your own eyes how gravity acts, throw a stone into water. The circles that form on the surface precisely depict gravity to you. Gravity acts in waves, that is the nucleus moves away from the nucleus for a long time in a straight line until it reaches a critical boundary and jumps onto the second gravitational “wave” of the original nucleus. At a certain moment the body is transferred by a jump. I hold that our history also records such “jumps” of our Earth from the Sun, or the time of the origin of our Moon. Let us take for example our ancient history, the period of the dinosaurs. All over the Earth we find skeletons of these giants. I ask, how is it possible that on our Earth sometime long ago several-dozen-metre living creatures lived? Life always adapts to circumstances and to “starting” conditions. In the present time no heavier animal lives on land than the elephant, in the oceans than the whale (gravity in waters is modified /adjusted/ by “Archimedes’” force; objects are buoyed up, therefore they can reach larger dimensions). The conditions between the past and the present must have changed significantly on our Earth. Gravitational force is greater in the present day than in the past. If you hypothetically today put a dinosaur from the past on its feet, it would not even move and probably all the bones in its legs would break and it would collapse. If you tried to breed it from genetic material, it would not grow for you into a larger scale of mass than today’s elephant. In the past lower gravity enabled life to grow into larger dimensions. We call this period the period of giants. I assume that the lower gravity was caused by the smaller size of the Earth, the smaller size of our nucleus. The Earth in the past had a solid shell and the shape of a flattened ball (just as our Moon today). Over time the Earth by the constant creation of matter in our nucleus inflates; the solid shell cracks and is filled by the constantly forming compound – water (seas and oceans arise). Our Earth grows and the resources in it are unlimited, but with a limited speed of renewal. It is correct if industry at present focuses mainly on gas and oil. By our industry we thus release pressure from the pressure cooker of gas and prevent the emergence of open oil fields that would pollute the environment. I write that if you reduced the Earth to 30 % of its size, all the continents would fit into each other and create a solid crust. The Earth would resemble a round rock. Dinosaurs are proof of growth, and their sudden extinction is proof of a jump (a jump in conditions). I assume that at the moment when the sudden extinction of our giants occurred on the planet, a jump of our planet onto a more distant orbit (gravitational wave of the Sun) also occurred. Whether in this period the process of the creation of our Moon took place or only a little later I cannot judge. I assume that another event in our history is connected with the Moon. The Great Flood of the world is documented in several writings, not only in the Old Testament. It is the period when allegedly the whole Earth was flooded with water. I connect the event precisely with the ejection of a new nucleus (the Moon) onto our orbit. The place from which the body “shot out” onto the orbit may be the place where our largest crater on Earth lies. The water that flooded the Earth was until the beginning of the event underground water of the Earth; by the ejection of the body water was also ejected together with matter, which fell onto the surface of the Earth and flooded it. Part of the matter was partially attracted by the Moon and part fell again onto the Earth. Waves of “tsunami” arose. I admit I may be mistaken and the Moon may have arisen even earlier than the documented flood. The flood may also have been a consequence of a further jump between orbits. It is difficult to judge events from the present. What is important is to understand the principle of the processes of our planet. Nothing is stable; everything changes, transforms. Our duty for the preservation of our species is to get off the Earth as soon as possible, because once the conditions for life on our planet will certainly change and in the final result we may end up like the dinosaurs. Understanding the principles of our electromagnetic world will help us quickly solve our situation. We will be able to build space “ships” of enormous dimensions, with their own gravity, with their own electromagnetic field. I assume that at the beginning construction will take place on the orbit of the Earth, later on the orbit of the Moon. The technology will finally enable us to get from the surface of the Earth beyond its shell and will give us the opportunity to visit also other planets. Permanent safety in a constantly changing universe can be achieved only by the ability to manoeuvre.
As you see, the potential of the technologies of life is enormous. Our future, however, does not depend only on the possible; it depends mainly on us, conscious autonomous units, and on our awareness. Informedness, information, the collective database of information are an important factor of our future success/failure. It is necessary to rely on the correct conception of thinking. Only thus will we be able to fully utilize our potential and achieve the desired utopia. Every advanced technology can be used for “good” goals, but equally also for “bad” ones. As long as people do not reach knowledge about collective importance and rush along the path of individualism, until then it is necessary to hide advanced technologies from them. A grenade does not belong in the hand of a monkey. The potential power in the nucleus is enormous. Nikola Tesla understood the principles very correctly already at the beginning of the 20th century. Imagine what the 2nd World War would have been like if his ideas had entered public life, if he had become famous and recognized already in his time. Fatal. Information is important, but education must proceed gradually. Today we live in a time when we must begin to use contemporary technologies to our advantage. The internet, the technology of interconnected heads, gives us the opportunity of an initial impulse to awakening. The increase of the speed of data flow has a concrete influence on our thinking, on the utilization of the common database of information and on the investigation of new technologies. As the main technology of the future in the area of information I consider telepathy. If in the meantime we do not mutually destroy ourselves, we will certainly reach it and our language will become obsolete. Today precisely our language is the greatest obstacle in mutual understanding. We are fragmented into too many groups that do not understand each other. We are not able to mutually cooperate in a larger number. In the world a wide range of languages is used from the most primitive to the most complex. We do have one global language in use (English), but precisely that belongs among the primitive ones. It is not easy in it to express complex ideas and still less to understand each other completely precisely. Language limits us not only in mutual understanding but also in the speed of the transfer of information. It takes time until something is written, it takes time until something is said, it takes time until it is understood. Telepathy would not only solve the problem of mutual understanding; at the same time it would shift the speed of the spread of information to an order of magnitude higher level. A jump in the awareness of humanity would occur and various cultures would by their knowledge quickly equalize among themselves. Its research would confirm the theory of the interconnected world. Our contemporary wi-fi network is the introductory technology of telepathy. We can arrive at complex technologies of the future only together. Autonomous units represent processors in our world capable of processing data. The more of them are interconnected, the greater performance they deliver. “More heads, more reason.”
In predicting the future it is not important only to be able to imagine our possibilities; it is also necessary to correctly estimate the mood/character of the future population/future society. In the present time it is being decided in the world which path humanity will take. Today we are experiencing the last crisis of the old world. Today we feel the enormous pressure of individualists to seize control on planet Earth. We feel their enormous need to reduce the population because they wrongly think that the planet is overpopulated and the only correct solution is to limit the consumption of resources. Their assumptions stem from a misunderstanding of the world, from a misunderstanding of the valid principles. By reducing the population they would (in a few human generations) get back to the Middle Ages, they would make technological progress impossible for themselves and a “jump” would await them for which they would not be prepared. Humanity will not hold on for long on the planet. Our only future is cooperation, mutual support and the path to the stars. In the coming decade it will be decided about our success or failure. Personally I am convinced that we will succeed in passing through the decisions of the present powerful madmen; their actions will contribute to the opening of many eyes. In the world they already have strong competition. A bright future awaits us. In this century we will reach the stars. Newly discovered energy sources will enable us to produce practically anything, in any quantity. A new social order will arise based on the newest knowledge. We will lift our means of transport into the air and forever forget terrestrial transport infrastructure. Roads, motorways will be demolished, railways dismantled. A whole range of new technologies will arise. Various autonomous units will take various paths; it is not possible to foresee all paths. What will unite us, however, will be unity, the understanding of the whole. We will understand slogans of the type “one for all, all for one” (etc.). We will reclaim the environment on the planet and subsequently leave the planet. We will begin to deal with infinity.
Juraj Tušš
