This is the most popular topic in pubs every four years. Do you know about it? Definitely, just like everyone else. I would like to bring you a different perspective and delve a little deeper into the subject. If you understand the principle, it is very easy to orient yourself in politics.
Before I begin, it is necessary to clarify the basic pillars on which the topic stands. It should be known that on Earth we distinguish three types of politics: global, foreign, and domestic (national). I have listed them in order from most influential to least influential. Global politics is one in which power is exerted globally regardless of lower forms of politics. Foreign policy is one in which a state's power is exerted on the territory of another state. Domestic policy is one in which power is exerted within a specific state. I often use the abstract word power, but what is power? Power is the ability to control applied in practice. In other words, the ability to influence the environment and change it. The higher the quality of your ability to manage/influence your environment, the greater power you hold. I outlined the management of society in previous articles. It should be realized that in our world, it is impossible to escape the influence of governance - either you govern or you allow yourself to be governed. This property arises from the nature of our interconnected world. Politics should therefore be understood as the management of society, the management of a constantly changing field of energy.
On Earth currently (and for quite some time), a "herd-elite" system of governing society is in place. This means that there is an elite that has the task of leading the herd (less aware consciousness) on the path of development, on the path of enlightenment in various ways. You may be outraged and say, "What am I talking about? The elite we see in the world only seeks to suck us dry and tear us apart, what development, what enlightenment?" You may object to the system, but if you think deeper about the problem, you must admit that it is the ideal form of development for less developed societies. What do I mean by this? At this point, you need to realize other facts. Our society is relatively young, only recently did the world connect through an artificial network - the Internet (still not everyone/3.5 billion people have access to the network), and we are capable of sharing ideas over greater distances. Only recently have we reached a population size that allows us to achieve better performance, use better performance, and more efficiently use our technologies. Many of the consciousnesses in our society are still immature, do not understand management, are dependent on others/are managed by others. They still look at the world from an animal perspective, direct observation, where they feel that the whole world revolves only around them. They can't even explain the principle of how "invisible" Wi-Fi works - for example :D. Societies lack the cadre, that is, conscious individuals in sufficient numbers to participate in quality management of humanity. At the same time, society is pushing "time". As humanity, we have a limited "time" to stay on planet Earth due to the natural course of things, and we can exhaust a limited amount of non-renewable resources at the same time - so as not to burden the biosphere to the extent that it becomes uninhabitable. As our population increases, the task of society's awareness becomes more important, considering that resource management becomes more demanding, and therefore we must take risks. The consequence of taking risks has led to the recognition of more types of elites (controlling groups) in the world. There are global, "human," and state elites. The global elite is the one that has been helping humanity in its development since the beginning. For example, look at the era of the pharaohs. The "human" elite is represented by people who represent the most aware part of our species - humanity - and is relatively young, as we have only recently achieved the necessary technological progress to realize the basic principles of life. The state elite was created by the global elite during the period in which the world began (and had to) globalize (to achieve more efficient use of resources, to increase the population on the planet/to increase computing power). The state elite is represented by less aware people, people with an animal-like mentality, the most capable of the incapable, the one-eyed among the blind. It was significantly shaped during the times of the British Empire, which colonized the world, an empire about which it was said that the sun never set on it. Building international trade and the structure of multinational companies required the capacity of controlling elites. It is evident that global players either did not want to participate, or did not reach the required number to create a global network of global companies, to create a global economy. "The" human elite did not yet exist (in the sense of global understanding of things), and if it did, it was only on a local level and in a small number. The state elite was trained in the basic knowledge of society management in order to take charge of global trade and effectively handle the resources on planet Earth. The intention may have been good, but in practice, the goal did not quite work out. Every individual consciousness learns from their own mistakes and experiences. You can pass any test or learn anything, but until you gain the necessary experience, you will not become an expert. Over time (from year to year), the semi-fools became the people deciding on the redistribution of most of the resources on planet Earth. (It is questionable whether this was intentional, as if you create a sufficient contrast in the informational field, more awareness will contribute to seeing the right direction). The state elite was given the artificial globalizing tool of money. Based on their own awareness and partial education, they set their own goals, which we can see in today's world as those causing problems for humanity. "The" human elite did not yet exist (in the sense of global understanding of things), and if it did, it was only on a local level and in a small number. The state elite was trained in the basic knowledge of society management in order to take charge of global trade and effectively handle the resources on planet Earth. The intention may have been good, but in practice, the goal did not quite work out. Every individual consciousness learns from their own mistakes and experiences. You can pass any test or learn anything, but until you gain the necessary experience, you will not become an expert. Over time (from year to year), the semi-fools became the people deciding on the redistribution of most of the resources on planet Earth. (It is questionable whether this was intentional, as if you create a sufficient contrast in the informational field, more awareness will contribute to seeing the right direction). The state elite was given the artificial globalizing tool of money. Based on their own awareness and partial education, they set their own goals, which we can see in today's world as those causing problems for humanity.
For a better understanding of the context and issues, you need to be familiar with the following. Power in the left-wing elitist system of governing society is divided into: 1/ Conceptual power, 2/ Ideological power, 3/ Legislative power, 4/ Judicial power, 5/ Executive power. (Ranked from most effective governance to least effective.)
1/ Conceptual power represents the management of society on the basis of information about the functioning principles of our world. It is the absolute foundation from which two main directions can be reflected in the information field. The first direction is individualism - meaning the understanding of the world from one's own point of view, including all the information about the beginning and end of the world, the need to gather resources, the animal view of the world in which the "predator and prey" law prevails - the animal law. In short. The second direction is collectivism - meaning the understanding of the world from the perspective of collective importance, the need for cooperation, all the information about the interconnected world, etc. In short.
2/ Ideological power directly stems from conceptual power, so again it aims in two basic directions, but further branches out. It encompasses all the various ideologies, theories, thoughts, and information summarized into partial units, including religions. It reflects either from the concept of individualism (capitalism, liberalism,...), or from the concept of collectivism (socialism, communism,...). Of course, there are many more ideologies, theories, and religions to cover as much of the area of current thinking of the planet's inhabitants as possible. Depending on the level of awareness, we tend to lean towards a particular ideology.
3/ Legislative power relies on ideologies to include the largest possible group of supporters of current thinking. It is no coincidence if pre-election slogans seem to be created using Google statistics :D. In less developed countries, where the animal type of psyche prevails in humans, legislative power is established autocratically without the need to rely on less or more complex ideas. The management is taken over directly and governed by foreign policy. In more developed countries, public opinion polls are regularly organized to determine which ideology currently prevails in society - elections. Based on the result, decisions are made on which direction to lead the society for further development. Since consciousness is learned from one's own experiences/mistakes, strategies for the development of society also include various forms of misconduct, i.e., unfavorable events (wars, unrest, diseases, disasters, etc.).
4/ Judicial power oversees compliance with the rules established by the legislative power.
5/ Executive power implements the decisions of the judicial and legislative powers through direct management.
The first two types of power represent exclusively indirect control of society. They are the most effective form of controlling society. If you believe in certain ideas, you will govern yourself accordingly. The remaining three types represent direct control of society. It is a very operative form of control, but also very susceptible to failure. The governing units (states) on the planet are divided according to the concept of an informational basis. There is a group of states that belong to the sphere of influence of the individualism concept and there is a group of states that belong to the sphere of influence of the collectivism concept. Ideologically, states may not be the same, but they have the same conceptual basis. States do not decide for themselves (there is no state as a state), on Earth, so-called centers of concentration of management are created. Depending on the technological sophistication, resource availability, and number of supporters of a given concept, control is concentrated in countries (USA, UK, Russia, China...), which are capable of global policy/global management. Through foreign policy (indirect control: diplomats and embassies/direct control: military bases), control is also maintained in less developed or smaller countries that do not have the necessary resource stability. In the globalized world, the state policy itself is therefore understood as the management of a certain territory controlled (through foreign policy) by the dominant center of concentration of management. The effectiveness/stability of management using a particular concept can be estimated depending on the number of supporters of that concept in a given state. Therefore, elections are necessary and crucial for each group, they are a litmus test of the state of society or the shift of the sphere of influence of the center of concentration of management.
So, if I simplify the reality, types of elites in the left-wing elitist system should be understood as follows: The global elite oversees the development of humanity, they are our teachers and depending on the established strategy, they lean towards one side or the other, creating a contrast that enables us to see. The human elite is the desired outcome of society's development, based on the concept of collectivism. The state elite is a group with partial knowledge, based on the concept of individualism, focused on the planet's resources, and possessing control over the artificial controlling tool - money. The masses are people with an animal-type psyche, focusing on basic instincts, without knowledge of their own importance or knowledge of how to govern society, leaning towards the concept of individualism.
Elite should be perceived as a transnational influential group of people. It does not operate within a specific state or nation, but across all states/nations. In a state, political parties are considered to be the controlling groups. Parties that rely on this or that ideology. Parties represented by the masses of different people, with different knowledge, parties that are represented by leaders from different types of elites. It is not uncommon for one party to be represented by people from different elites, ideologies, and concepts. There are few purely reserved parties. Therefore, politics should not be divided vertically (by parties and factions), but horizontally (by knowledge and influence/applied power). It does not depend on the party, but on the applied concept and level of knowledge of specific people. This is precisely the fact that confuses many people in decision-making and understanding of a given policy. Many leaders in pre-election debates wield humanity, honesty, and the fight against evil, but when it comes to breadwinning, they follow a clear path of the opposite concept. Therefore, it is not uncommon for politicians to cover themselves with a foreign ideology and camouflage their own. An ignorant person falls for it, but an enlightened one clearly recognizes them. It is not difficult to expose them, just focus your attention on their main tool used - money, numbers. Anyone who wields money or numbers on virtual markets is wealthy and has dedicated their entire life to building their own "financial independence" - they do not know much about life yet and are pursuing a clear path of the concept of individualism. You know the tree by its fruit, as the old saying goes. The rule of dichotomy also applies, one cannot sit on two chairs, they always sit on only one. After all, how would a person look promoting the concept of individualism and at the same time the concept of collectivism? Hmm... You won't believe it, but there is actually one such social experiment in the world on a larger scale. It is the Jewish state. Chosen among nations, cooperating mainly within its own community. Diversity and variety of communities help us in the development of the whole, but the only desired final result must be an understanding of the concept of collectivism across all communities. Only if we understand the interconnectedness of everything, sharing information, if we understand the world as a constantly changing field of energy, an information field, of which we are a direct extension, will we see our true potential and be able to achieve utopia. We must understand the saying: "Treat your enemy as if he were your future friend." Politics is not as complicated as it seems. The task is to realize/educate individual autonomous units/consciousness (educate people) in various ways using their own experiences so that they themselves understand the concept of collectivism/interconnected world. We don't fight evil in the world, but stupidity.
Why do I still believe that the concept of individualism is inferior to the concept of collectivism? Isn't the situation the opposite? Doesn't individualism represent the path of enlightenment, the path of progress, and collectivism just a utopian reactionary view? No, you just need to understand that individualism is a deception. Yes, if you look at the world directly, you see only your view, your comfort, your possibilities. It may seem that your life depends only on you, but just think about what you can realistically do during one day, what activities you can produce on your own, and you'll realize that your comfort comes from cooperation among different people and not just from your uniqueness. If you want bread in the morning, if you want to drive to work in the morning, if you want to dress nicely, all the daily details depend on cooperation within society. Bread, cars, clothing - imagine if you had to make everything yourself. That would not be comfortable. Specialization is necessary, and it involves the globalization of resources. It is no coincidence that you can see various specialized parts of the world. In one part, resource extraction takes place, in another, production, in the third, technology development, and the fourth is for relaxation and rest. The world is globalized and used more efficiently. Imagine a population of 7.8 billion people, each striving for their own self-sufficiency in every part of life. Wouldn't it be a waste of resources? Individualism comes from a misunderstanding of one's own existence. If someone thinks that humanity has finally advanced technologically to a comfortable life for the elite, but is struggling with overpopulation and needs to eliminate simple individuals to leave only a billion or half a billion truly rational people with sufficient resources for further development, such a person is also "damned" wrong. It is precisely our number that allows us to use higher performance. In the alternative where genocide of the population took place and 7 billion people on the planet were eliminated, an information deficit would occur, progress would stop, and the next generation would degrade. People would eventually regress back to the Middle Ages and even current robotics would not help them because generations of humanity would become less intelligent and unable to use more complex technologies. The situation is similar to our brain, the more active neural endings there are, the higher the brain's performance. Individualism is a habit from the animal kingdom, perhaps evidence of interspecies reincarnation and the development of consciousness in a longer horizon. The task of people is to mature from their animal past and move to the next level - to unity, to humanity. It is promising for us to maintain exponential population growth, but our education system must also teach new generations to understand, to cooperate, to the principles of the most advanced technologies so that they understand reality from the most advanced knowledge and can autonomously manage/decide in life. The current problem of growth is the limited space and the limit in acquiring resources simultaneously. The ecology of the planet is in a terrible state, and many species are facing extinction. The more diversity, the more beneficial impact on the whole (more perspectives when gaining experience/information as a whole). You may have witnessed theatrical advocacy of this problem with Greta last year. This year, we have seen uncompromising production restrictions and economic constraints due to global policies (the corona crisis). We are on the edge of current possibilities. Once again, society must globalize more and kick-start closer cooperation. It should be noted that through patents, licenses, and scientific grants, we are prevented from reaching a higher technological level of humanity. First, we must learn mutualism because further technologies that solve our current problems stem from the nature of how our world functions. We will be able to obtain an enormous amount of energy with them, sufficient to destroy not only our world. A monkey should not hold a grenade. Until the concept of collectivism prevails in our politics, we will be suffocated and boiled in our juices by the "judges." Further progress is not possible as long as we view the world through an animalistic lens. "Global players" will not allow it.
The entertainment industry is a popular tool used by global players to implement global politics. Music, movies, sports... Often, these works carry messages and change the information field. The truth is that these "tools" are used by all kinds of elites, and the diversity of politics can be seen in the final quality of a specific work. Through the entertainment industry, various ideas are instilled in people on an ideological level, fulfilling various goals in governing society. For example, a series of films was made that shows us different scenarios for our common future. If humanity succeeds and is able to realize a greater part of its kind, so that a different system of governing society arises, different from the herd-elite system, then our future will resemble Star Trek (exploration and travel through space). If it takes humanity too long to realize the wider masses and we still follow herd-elitism, our future will resemble District 9 (zones will be established on the planet, differentiated by quality of life based on awareness). If humanity fails in its development, the concept of individualism will prevail, creating a conceptual unipolar world, and our future will resemble the movie Mad Max (fighting for survival on a hostile planet).
Currently, the concept of individualism is "fighting" for its survival. As mentioned above, for any concept to be sustainable, it needs resources. And they are running out, especially in the western hemisphere. The economy of the West is built on a pyramid base. It works as long as the influence of the concept of individualism can spread around the world. From newly acquired areas, it then obtains resources for its functioning through its foreign policy. Financial derivatives are the dream of various businessmen, but they have value only until it is discovered that they have none. Since the concept is mainly a representative of direct governance, its devastating effects are visible all over the world. Syria, Libya, Ukraine, Venezuela, Afghanistan, the entire Central Africa. Countries that are deliberately destroyed to submit to a "higher" power. Fortunately, the unipolar world failed to be built in the last century. The concept of individualism is not the only one and must deal with competition, with collectivism. While one side in the struggle uses weapons, threats, censorship, economic sanctions (in the past, besieging and starving the given area was used), the other side primarily uses diplomacy, information, negotiation, concessions. The difference in level is evident. If the scales do not tilt again in favor of individualism, as was the case in the 1950s and 1960s, then I am convinced that we will manage to mature.
When discussing politics, many people ask how long we have to wait, how long we have to suffer, and why we don't start a revolution right away. However, it should be realized that people cannot be forced to do anything by force, not even to love each other. Direct control is the last resort in defending oneself. It is useless to put knowledgeable people in charge of a country until the majority of society realizes the essence of existence, as there will be no miracles until then. Therefore, patience is necessary. Look at the attempts to establish socialism after World War II. There was a lack of qualified personnel, and there was no support from the population. Supporters of individualism should be viewed as children; they make many mistakes, but eventually they mature, and their life experiences teach them to look at the world correctly. Sooner or later. Every autonomous unit (every consciousness) possesses an unimaginable creative power. We need every consciousness to solve the complex situations and challenges we encounter in life. Even though they may seem like enemies to us at the moment, they are actually our friends. We all have the same foundation. That's what collectivism is all about. It's about everyone working together.